Self-Assessment of Disability in Parkinson's Disease: The MDS-UPDRS Part II Versus Clinician-Based Ratings

Carmen Rodríguez-Blázquez, Mario Alvarez, Tomoko Arakaki, Víctor Campos Arillo, Pedro Chaná, William Fernández, Nélida Garretto, Juan Carlos Martínez-Castrillo, Mayela Rodríguez-Violante, Marcos Serrano-Dueñas, Diego Ballesteros, Jose Manuel Rojo-Abuin, Kallol Ray Chaudhuri, Marcelo Merello, Pablo Martínez-Martín

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

13 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by motor and nonmotor symptoms that progress with time, causing disability. The performance of a disease-specific, self-applied tool for assessing disability, the MDS-UPDRS Part II, is tested against generic and rater-based rating scales. Methods: An international, cross-sectional, observational study was performed. Patients were assessed with the Hoehn and Yahr (HY) and five disability measures: MDS-UPDRS Part II, Schwab and England Scale (S&E), Clinical Impression of Severity Index-PD (CISI-PD) Disability item, Barthel Index (BI), and Rapid Assessment of Disability Scale (RADS). Data analysis included correlation coefficients, Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests, and intraclass-correlation coefficient for concordance. Results: The sample was composed of 451 patients, 55.2% men, with a mean age of 65.06 years (SD = 10.71). Disability rating scales correlated from |0.75| (CISI-PD Disability with BI) to 0.87 (MDS-UPDRS Part II with RADS). In general, MDS-UPDRS Part II showed high correlation coefficients with clinical variables and satisfactory concordance with the rest of disability measures, with ICC ranging from 0.83 (with BI) to 0.93 (with RADS). All disability rating scales showed statistical significant differences in the sample grouped by sex, age, disease duration, and severity level. Conclusions: The MDS-UPDRS Part II showed an appropriate performance to assess disability in PD, even better than some rater-based, generic or specific, scales applied in this study.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)529-535
Número de páginas7
PublicaciónMovement Disorders Clinical Practice
Volumen4
N.º4
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 1 jul. 2017

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Self-Assessment of Disability in Parkinson's Disease: The MDS-UPDRS Part II Versus Clinician-Based Ratings'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto