Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Implementation and effects of social protection programs for children, older adults, and people with disabilities in Brazil and Ecuador: A scoping review

  • Julia M. Pescarini*
  • , Ana L. Moncayo*
  • , Joanna M.N. Guimarães
  • , Francine S. Dias
  • , Ronald Ruiz
  • , Samuel A.G. da Silva
  • , Gustavo Casais
  • , Michal Shimonovich
  • , Valerie Wells
  • , Mhairi Campbell
  • , Mauricio L. Barreto
  • , S. Vittal Katikireddi
  • , Gustavo Matta
  • , Peter Craig
  • *Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Producción científica: RevistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

We conducted a scoping review to investigate planned (intentional) and unplanned (not intentional) effects of social protection on socioeconomic determinants of health (SDH) and health inequalities among children, adolescents, elders and people with disabilities, and their caregivers. We reviewed seven programs in (i) Brazil (Programa Bolsa Familia (BFP) and Beneficio de Prestacao Continuada (BPC)), and (ii) Ecuador (Bono de Desarrolo Humano (BDH), Bono 1000 días, Pensión Mis Mejores Años/Pensión para Adultos Mayores, Pensión Toda una Vida/Pensión para personas con discapacidad and Bono Joaquín Gallegos Lara). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, Scopus, Econlit, PsycINFO, Global Health, Global Index Medicus and grey literature for studies evaluating program implementation and effects on health outcomes or SDH from 1990 to 2023. We extracted data from 114 studies (84 on BFP, 17 on BDH and 13 on BPC). No studies were identified for the remaining programs. In Brazil, we found substantial evidence of BFP planned effects on children’s health and some SDH but little evidence on its unplanned effects in adults and caregivers. Evidence effects of BPC on health outcomes were scarce, with only one study in elders and none among people with disabilities. In Ecuador, we found evidence only for BDH, with some studies on planned health effects and few on SDH and its unplanned effects. Very few studies used longitudinal data, quasi-experimental designs, or comparison groups of eligible non-recipients. Finally, we found large variations coverage and implementation of programs. In summary, our review highlights the lack of evidence on the overall impacts of social protection in Ecuador, particularly those targeting older adults and people with disabilities. In Brazil, further research is needed on unplanned health effects of the BFP and on the impacts of social protection targeting elders and people with disabilities.

Idioma originalInglés
Número de artículoe0005281
PublicaciónPLOS Global Public Health
Volumen5
N.º10
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 29 oct 2025

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Pescarini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Financiación

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
National Institute for Health ResearchNIHR134801

    ODS de las Naciones Unidas

    Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

    1. ODS 1: Fin de la pobreza
      ODS 1: Fin de la pobreza
    2. ODS 10: Reducción de las desigualdades
      ODS 10: Reducción de las desigualdades

    Base de Datos Indexada

    • SCOPUS

    Cuartil Publicación

    • NAQ2

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Implementation and effects of social protection programs for children, older adults, and people with disabilities in Brazil and Ecuador: A scoping review'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto