TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of increased ventilation on indoor temperature and malaria mosquito density
T2 - An experimental study in the Gambia
AU - Jatta, Ebrima
AU - Carrasco-Tenezaca, Majo
AU - Jawara, Musa
AU - Bradley, John
AU - Ceesay, Sainey
AU - D'Alessandro, Umberto
AU - Jeffries, David
AU - Kandeh, Balla
AU - Lee, Daniel Sang Hoon
AU - Pinder, Margaret
AU - Wilson, Anne L.
AU - Knudsen, Jakob
AU - Lindsay, Steve W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors.
PY - 2021/5/12
Y1 - 2021/5/12
N2 - In sub-Saharan Africa, cooler houses would increase the coverage of insecticide-treated bednets, the primary malaria control tool. We examined whether improved ventilation, using windows screened with netting, cools houses at night and reduces malaria mosquito house entry in The Gambia. Identical houses were constructed, with badly fitting doors the only mosquito entry points. Two men slept in each house and mosquitoes captured using light traps. First, temperature and mosquito density were compared in four houses with 0, 1, 2 and 3 screened windows. Second, carbon dioxide (CO 2), a major mosquito attractant, was measured in houses with (i) no windows, (ii) screened windows and (iii) screened windows and screened doors. Computational fluid dynamic modelling captured the spatial movement of CO 2. Increasing ventilation made houses cooler, more comfortable and reduced malaria mosquito house entry; with three windows reducing mosquito densities by 95% (95%CI = 90-98%). Screened windows and doors reduced the indoor temperature by 0.6°C (95%CI = 0.5-0.7°C), indoor CO 2 concentrations by 31% between 21.00 and 00.00 h and malaria mosquito entry by 76% (95%CI = 69-82%). Modelling shows screening reduces CO 2 plumes from houses. Under our experimental conditions, cross-ventilation not only reduced indoor temperature, but reduced the density of house-entering malaria mosquitoes, by weakening CO 2 plumes emanating from houses.
AB - In sub-Saharan Africa, cooler houses would increase the coverage of insecticide-treated bednets, the primary malaria control tool. We examined whether improved ventilation, using windows screened with netting, cools houses at night and reduces malaria mosquito house entry in The Gambia. Identical houses were constructed, with badly fitting doors the only mosquito entry points. Two men slept in each house and mosquitoes captured using light traps. First, temperature and mosquito density were compared in four houses with 0, 1, 2 and 3 screened windows. Second, carbon dioxide (CO 2), a major mosquito attractant, was measured in houses with (i) no windows, (ii) screened windows and (iii) screened windows and screened doors. Computational fluid dynamic modelling captured the spatial movement of CO 2. Increasing ventilation made houses cooler, more comfortable and reduced malaria mosquito house entry; with three windows reducing mosquito densities by 95% (95%CI = 90-98%). Screened windows and doors reduced the indoor temperature by 0.6°C (95%CI = 0.5-0.7°C), indoor CO 2 concentrations by 31% between 21.00 and 00.00 h and malaria mosquito entry by 76% (95%CI = 69-82%). Modelling shows screening reduces CO 2 plumes from houses. Under our experimental conditions, cross-ventilation not only reduced indoor temperature, but reduced the density of house-entering malaria mosquitoes, by weakening CO 2 plumes emanating from houses.
KW - carbon dioxide
KW - housing
KW - human comfort
KW - malaria
KW - sub-Saharan Africa
KW - ventilation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105770480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rsif.2020.1030
DO - 10.1098/rsif.2020.1030
M3 - Article
C2 - 33975463
AN - SCOPUS:85105770480
SN - 1742-5689
VL - 18
JO - Journal of the Royal Society Interface
JF - Journal of the Royal Society Interface
IS - 178
M1 - 20201030
ER -