Resumen
Russell and De Giorgi's approaches, starting from the logical limitations established by Gödel, appear to be unusually divergent. De Giorgi's ultra-experimental technique will end up opposing to Russell's theory of types - paradoxically close to certain Thomistic solutions - a formulation free from scholasticism; similarly, the ambitions of Pythagorean completeness present in Russell are replaced, in De Giorgi's philosophy, with an adherence to insolubility as a guarantee of transcendence. «God cannot be reduced to the “first self-understanding entity”». With this judgment of strict scientific observance, and only apparent religious apostasy, De Giorgi is girding to rethink the conditions of mathematical formalism from within.
| Título traducido de la contribución | The philosophical thought of Ennio De Giorgi |
|---|---|
| Idioma original | Italiano |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 213-227 |
| Número de páginas | 15 |
| Publicación | Intersezioni |
| Volumen | 41 |
| N.º | 2 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - ago. 2021 |
| Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Societa Editrice il Mulino. All rights reserved.