Resumen
Russell and De Giorgi's approaches, starting from the logical limitations established by Gödel, appear to be unusually divergent. De Giorgi's ultra-experimental technique will end up opposing to Russell's theory of types - paradoxically close to certain Thomistic solutions - a formulation free from scholasticism; similarly, the ambitions of Pythagorean completeness present in Russell are replaced, in De Giorgi's philosophy, with an adherence to insolubility as a guarantee of transcendence. «God cannot be reduced to the “first self-understanding entity”». With this judgment of strict scientific observance, and only apparent religious apostasy, De Giorgi is girding to rethink the conditions of mathematical formalism from within.
Título traducido de la contribución | The philosophical thought of Ennio De Giorgi |
---|---|
Idioma original | Italiano |
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 213-227 |
Número de páginas | 15 |
Publicación | Intersezioni |
Volumen | 41 |
N.º | 2 |
DOI | |
Estado | Publicada - ago. 2021 |
Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Societa Editrice il Mulino. All rights reserved.