Resumen
Mental health measurement instruments are not adapted and validated in Ecuadorian and this makes it difficult for work's psychologist. Aims: Checking the GHQ-12 model like a single factor, and decide the reliability and validity of the test. Design: Quantitative instrumental study with a multivariate analysis of the items, factorial and internal consistency using the Goldberg General Health Questionnaire of 12 items. Sample: 587 university students (71.4% women), with an average age of M = 21.2 years, in Ambato (50.5%) and Cuenca (49.5%) cities from Ecuador and in three universities centers. Outcomes: The one-dimensional model with correlated errors of the GHQ-12 is confirmed X2(39)= 65.7; X2/Df = 1.7; GFI =.96; CFI =.96; NFI =.92; RMSEA =.053 [.029 -.075]. The test's reliability is adequate ω =.84 and converges with psychological well-being r =.674. Conclusions: The GHQ-12 presents evidence of validity for use in mental health assessments based on the sample investigated.
Título traducido de la contribución | Factor structure and reliability of the Goldberg General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in ecuadorian university students. |
---|---|
Idioma original | Español |
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 35-42 |
Número de páginas | 8 |
Publicación | Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento |
Volumen | 10 |
N.º | 3 |
DOI | |
Estado | Publicada - 2018 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2018 Universidad Nacional de Cordoba - Facultad de Psicologia. All Rights Reserved.
Palabras clave
- Factor analysis
- Mental health
- Reliability
- Structure