Case study comparisons of the ecological footprint on social housing after earthquake

Michael Davis; Enrique Villacis; M. Lorena Rodriguez; Cynthia Ayarza; Domenica Davila; Cristina Fernandez; Daniela Jarrin; Josselyn Nacevilla; Javier Vizcaino

doi:10.14455/isec.res.2019.37

Case study comparisons of the ecological footprint on social housing after earthquake

Michael Davis, Enrique Villacis, M. Lorena Rodriguez, Cynthia Ayarza, Domenica Davila, Cristina Fernandez, Daniela Jarrin, Josselyn Nacevilla, Javier Vizcaino

Producción científica: Capítulo del libro/informe/acta de congreso › Contribución de conferencia › revisión exhaustiva

1 Cita (Scopus)

Resumen

This research seeks to distinguish which factors influence the ecological footprint and what types of construction have the least environmental impact in a post-disaster social housing building. The first case study is a government social housing design, built with bamboo and concrete masonry blocks, and another design by Ensusitio, a private practice approach to social housing built with bamboo and earth. These houses were granted to victims of the April 2016 earthquake in the Ecuadorian coastal region. The investigation process was carried out based on primary research, which was used to understand how Ensusitio carried out the construction process of Meche's house and also based on a secondary investigation of government social housing. With this information, a comparison is made between them to determine which of the two has the least ecological footprint.

Idioma original	Inglés
Título de la publicación alojada	ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference
Editores	Didem Ozevin, Hossein Ataei, Mehdi Modares, Asli Pelin Gurgun, Siamak Yazdani, Amarjit Singh
Editorial	ISEC Press
ISBN (versión digital)	9780996043762
DOI	https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.res.2019.37
Estado	Publicada - 2019
Evento	10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, ISEC 2019 - Chicago, Estados Unidos Duración: 20 may. 2019 → 25 may. 2019

Serie de la publicación

Nombre	ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference

Conferencia

Conferencia	10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, ISEC 2019
País/Territorio	Estados Unidos
Ciudad	Chicago
Período	20/05/19 → 25/05/19

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 ISEC Press.

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

Acceder al documento

10.14455/isec.res.2019.37

Otros archivos y enlaces

Enlace a la publicación en Scopus

Citar esto

Davis, M., Villacis, E., Rodriguez, M. L., Ayarza, C., Davila, D., Fernandez, C., Jarrin, D., Nacevilla, J., & Vizcaino, J. (2019). Case study comparisons of the ecological footprint on social housing after earthquake. En D. Ozevin, H. Ataei, M. Modares, A. P. Gurgun, S. Yazdani, & A. Singh (Eds.), ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference). ISEC Press. https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.res.2019.37

Davis, Michael ; Villacis, Enrique ; Rodriguez, M. Lorena et al. / Case study comparisons of the ecological footprint on social housing after earthquake. ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference. editor / Didem Ozevin ; Hossein Ataei ; Mehdi Modares ; Asli Pelin Gurgun ; Siamak Yazdani ; Amarjit Singh. ISEC Press, 2019. (ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference).

@inproceedings{f140bc9e319e40eda2d32415d0fa2168,

title = "Case study comparisons of the ecological footprint on social housing after earthquake",

abstract = "This research seeks to distinguish which factors influence the ecological footprint and what types of construction have the least environmental impact in a post-disaster social housing building. The first case study is a government social housing design, built with bamboo and concrete masonry blocks, and another design by Ensusitio, a private practice approach to social housing built with bamboo and earth. These houses were granted to victims of the April 2016 earthquake in the Ecuadorian coastal region. The investigation process was carried out based on primary research, which was used to understand how Ensusitio carried out the construction process of Meche's house and also based on a secondary investigation of government social housing. With this information, a comparison is made between them to determine which of the two has the least ecological footprint.",

keywords = "Bamboo, Local materials, Masonry block, Mass production, Meche{\textquoteright}s house",

author = "Michael Davis and Enrique Villacis and Rodriguez, {M. Lorena} and Cynthia Ayarza and Domenica Davila and Cristina Fernandez and Daniela Jarrin and Josselyn Nacevilla and Javier Vizcaino",

note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2019 ISEC Press.; 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, ISEC 2019 ; Conference date: 20-05-2019 Through 25-05-2019",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.14455/isec.res.2019.37",

language = "English",

series = "ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference",

publisher = "ISEC Press",

editor = "Didem Ozevin and Hossein Ataei and Mehdi Modares and Gurgun, {Asli Pelin} and Siamak Yazdani and Amarjit Singh",

booktitle = "ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference",

}

Davis, M , Villacis, E, Rodriguez, ML, Ayarza, C, Davila, D, Fernandez, C, Jarrin, D, Nacevilla, J & Vizcaino, J 2019, Case study comparisons of the ecological footprint on social housing after earthquake. En D Ozevin, H Ataei, M Modares, AP Gurgun, S Yazdani & A Singh (eds.), ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference. ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, ISEC Press, 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, ISEC 2019, Chicago, Estados Unidos, 20/05/19. https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.res.2019.37

Case study comparisons of the ecological footprint on social housing after earthquake. / Davis, Michael ; Villacis, Enrique; Rodriguez, M. Lorena et al.
ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference. ed. / Didem Ozevin; Hossein Ataei; Mehdi Modares; Asli Pelin Gurgun; Siamak Yazdani; Amarjit Singh. ISEC Press, 2019. (ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference).

Producción científica: Capítulo del libro/informe/acta de congreso › Contribución de conferencia › revisión exhaustiva

TY - GEN

T1 - Case study comparisons of the ecological footprint on social housing after earthquake

AU - Davis, Michael

AU - Villacis, Enrique

AU - Rodriguez, M. Lorena

AU - Ayarza, Cynthia

AU - Davila, Domenica

AU - Fernandez, Cristina

AU - Jarrin, Daniela

AU - Nacevilla, Josselyn

AU - Vizcaino, Javier

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This research seeks to distinguish which factors influence the ecological footprint and what types of construction have the least environmental impact in a post-disaster social housing building. The first case study is a government social housing design, built with bamboo and concrete masonry blocks, and another design by Ensusitio, a private practice approach to social housing built with bamboo and earth. These houses were granted to victims of the April 2016 earthquake in the Ecuadorian coastal region. The investigation process was carried out based on primary research, which was used to understand how Ensusitio carried out the construction process of Meche's house and also based on a secondary investigation of government social housing. With this information, a comparison is made between them to determine which of the two has the least ecological footprint.

AB - This research seeks to distinguish which factors influence the ecological footprint and what types of construction have the least environmental impact in a post-disaster social housing building. The first case study is a government social housing design, built with bamboo and concrete masonry blocks, and another design by Ensusitio, a private practice approach to social housing built with bamboo and earth. These houses were granted to victims of the April 2016 earthquake in the Ecuadorian coastal region. The investigation process was carried out based on primary research, which was used to understand how Ensusitio carried out the construction process of Meche's house and also based on a secondary investigation of government social housing. With this information, a comparison is made between them to determine which of the two has the least ecological footprint.

KW - Bamboo

KW - Local materials

KW - Masonry block

KW - Mass production

KW - Meche’s house

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088073151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14455/isec.res.2019.37

DO - 10.14455/isec.res.2019.37

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85088073151

T3 - ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference

BT - ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference

A2 - Ozevin, Didem

A2 - Ataei, Hossein

A2 - Modares, Mehdi

A2 - Gurgun, Asli Pelin

A2 - Yazdani, Siamak

A2 - Singh, Amarjit

PB - ISEC Press

T2 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, ISEC 2019

Y2 - 20 May 2019 through 25 May 2019

ER -

Davis M , Villacis E, Rodriguez ML, Ayarza C, Davila D, Fernandez C et al. Case study comparisons of the ecological footprint on social housing after earthquake. En Ozevin D, Ataei H, Modares M, Gurgun AP, Yazdani S, Singh A, editores, ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference. ISEC Press. 2019. (ISEC 2019 - 10th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference). doi: 10.14455/isec.res.2019.37

Case study comparisons of the ecological footprint on social housing after earthquake

Resumen

Serie de la publicación

Conferencia

Nota bibliográfica

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto