Use of primidone in low doses (250 mg/day) versus high doses (750 mg/day) in the management of essential tremor. Double-blind comparative study with one-year follow-up

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Essential tremor is the most common involuntary movement; we studied 113 affected subjects (54 men, 59 women) with an average age of 63.9 years and average duration of 9.05 years. These patients participated in a double-blind study with a 1-year follow-up to compare treatment efficiency using primidone dosages of 250 mg/day (G 250, 56 patients) versus 750 mg/day (G 750, 57 patients). The study was designed with an 80% power and 95% confidence level. The statistical analysis used was an ANOVA (with Bonferroni multiple comparison test corrections); a value of p < 0.004 was accepted as significant. To compare other values, a chi-square test was used; p < 0.05 was considered significant. To evaluate the efficacy of the drug, clinical protocol employed the 'clinical evaluation scale for tremor'. All of the patients were evaluated a total of 13 times, once prior to the introduction of primidone and the other 12 evaluations following the initiation of the treatment. Eighty-seven patients completed the study: 15 patients abandoned the study due to undesirable side effects, five due to negative response, and six who were lost to follow-up. The percentage of patients who didn't complete the study was significantly higher in the group that received 750 mg/day of primidone (p < 0.04) and more frequent as well in this same group, due to undesirable side effects (p < 0.03). The patients of both G250 and G750 showed a significant improvement in each of the controls compared to the basal value (p < 0.0001). No significant differences (p < 0.06) were found when the averages of the evaluations of each group were compared. These responses were maintained during the entire treatment period. Low doses of primidone (250 mg/day) were equally or more effective than high doses (750 mg/day) in the control of essential tremor; this response was maintained for 12 months and furthermore, demonstrated fewer undesirable effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-33
Number of pages5
JournalParkinsonism and Related Disorders
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2003

Funding

The author acknowledges the Fundación Luis Pala for funding this study (FLP/0-0179/18/02/1994). Special thanks to the directors and employees of the Fundación Salud Integral Popular and the members of the Movimiento Juvenil Ecuatoriano, both in Quito, Ecuador, for their assistance throughout the study. To Peggy Stern, PhD for editorial assistance and suggestions. Finally to reviewers of the original manuscript.

FundersFunder number
Fundación Luis PalaFLP/0-0179/18/02/1994

    Keywords

    • Essential tremor
    • Phenobarbital
    • Primidone

    Cite this