Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Socioeconomic inequalities and measles immunization coverage in Ecuador: A spatial analysis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Introduction/Background: Inequalities in measles immunization coverage facilitate the onset of outbreaks. This study aimed to quantify socioeconomic inequalities associated with measles immunization coverage at the population level. Methods: An ecological study was performed using two datasets: the results of a measles immunization survey performed in Ecuador, in 2011, and socioeconomic data from the 2010 census, aggregated by canton. The survey included 3,140,799 people aged 6 months to 14 years living in 220 cantons of Ecuador. Vaccinated children were considered those who received at least one dose of vaccine against measles. Multiple spatial regression was performed to identify socioeconomic inequalities associated with measles immunization coverage. The slope index of inequality and the relative index of inequality were calculated. Results: Vaccination coverage against measles was inversely associated with unsatisfied basic needs in urban areas (P < 0.01) and the proportions of indigenous and African-Ecuadorian residents in the canton (P = 0.015), and directly associated with unemployment rate in the canton (P = 0.037). The distribution of immunization coverage across the cantons was heterogeneous, indicating spatial dependence. The non-immunization rate was 71% higher in the poorer cantons than in the upper stratum cantons (prevalence ratio 1.71; 95%CI: 1.69–1.72). A difference of 10.6 percentage points was detected in immunization coverage between cantons with the best vs. worst socioeconomic level, according to the slope index of inequality. The relative index of inequality revealed that immunization coverage was 1.12 times higher in cantons with the highest socioeconomic level vs. cantons with the lowest socioeconomic level. Conclusions: The spatial dependence between measles vaccination coverage and socioeconomic disparities suggests clusters of vulnerable populations for outbreaks. Health and social inequalities must be considered to achieve and maintain measles elimination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5251-5257
Number of pages7
JournalVaccine
Volume36
Issue number35
DOIs
StatePublished - 23 Aug 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd

Funding

Brazilian funding agencies CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) sponsored the Doctoral Fellowship of M.F.R. (Graduate Student Exchange Program – PEC-PG) at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Graduate Program in Epidemiology. The sponsors had no participation in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. Brazilian funding agencies CAPES (Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior) and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico) sponsored the Doctoral Fellowship of M.F.R. (Graduate Student Exchange Program ? PEC-PG) at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Graduate Program in Epidemiology. The sponsors had no participation in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
      SDG 1 No Poverty
    2. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
    3. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
      SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

    Keywords

    • Epidemiological monitoring
    • Health care disparities
    • Measles-containing vaccine
    • Socioeconomic factors

    Cite this