Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Human–nature relationships through the lens of reciprocity: Insights from Indigenous and local knowledge systems

  • Irene Teixidor-Toneu*
  • , Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares*
  • , Ricardo Alvarez Abel
  • , Gantuya Batdelger
  • , Elicia Bell
  • , Sophie Caillon
  • , Mauricio Cantor
  • , Joel E. Correia
  • , Sandra Díaz
  • , Jonathan Fisk
  • , Alexander Greene
  • , Spencer Greening
  • , Simon Hoyte
  • , Raivo Kalle
  • , Gabriela Loayza
  • , Giulia Mattalia
  • , Rommel Montúfar
  • , Jaime Ojeda
  • , Suwichan Phatthanaphraiwan
  • , Ismael Vaccaro
  • Natalie C. Ban*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

Abstract

In the context of climate change, biodiversity decline and social injustice, reciprocity emerges as a way of living and being in this world that holds transformative potential. Concepts of reciprocity vary and are enacted in specific cultural practices grounded in Indigenous and local knowledge systems. This editorial synthesises first-hand evidence of how practising reciprocity can result in positive reciprocal contributions between people and nature. It also offers a theoretical justification of why considering reciprocity can lead to more equitable, inclusive and effective conservation and sustainability policy and practices, contributing to curving the colonial baggage of academic inquiry and development action. Nurturing reciprocal relations between people, especially between academics and Indigenous Peoples and local communities, is a necessary first step to identifying pathways whereby living in harmony with nature can be achieved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)922-933
Number of pages12
JournalPeople and Nature
Volume7
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). People and Nature published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

Funding

We dedicate this work to all the knowledge holders, thinkers, philosophers, scholars, friends and grandparents who have taught us about reciprocity. This work is for all of them. We thank each and every one of the reviewers who have generously revised the articles compiled in this Special Feature and the People and Nature editorial office team for their support. I.T.-T. has received financial support from the IRD ANR-CPJ contract number 402299/00 and from the French government under the France 2030 investment plan, as part of the Initiative d'Excellence d'Aix-Marseille Université—A*MIDEX (AMX-22-CPJ-05). Á.F.-L. was supported by a Ramón y Cajal grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (RYC2021-034198-I) and the European Union (ERC, IEK-CHANGES, 101117423). R.K. was supported by the Estonian Research Council (grant agreement no. STP37). J.O. has received support from the ANID/BASAL FB210018 fund. N.C.B. was supported by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the University of Victoria. M.C. received a National Geographic Society grant (NGS-101549R-23) and support from the Long-Term Ecological Research Program PELD-SELA funded by the Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico (CNPq 445301/2020-1). We dedicate this work to all the knowledge holders, thinkers, philosophers, scholars, friends and grandparents who have taught us about reciprocity. This work is for all of them. We thank each and every one of the reviewers who have generously revised the articles compiled in this Special Feature and the People and Nature editorial office team for their support. I.T.‐T. has received financial support from the IRD ANR‐CPJ contract number 402299/00 and from the French government under the France 2030 investment plan, as part of the Initiative d'Excellence d'Aix‐Marseille Université—A*MIDEX (AMX‐22‐CPJ‐05). Á.F.‐L. was supported by a Ramón y Cajal grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (RYC2021‐034198‐I) and the European Union (ERC, IEK‐CHANGES, 101117423). R.K. was supported by the Estonian Research Council (grant agreement no. STP37). J.O. has received support from the ANID/BASAL FB210018 fund. N.C.B. was supported by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the University of Victoria. M.C. received a National Geographic Society grant (NGS‐101549R‐23) and support from the Long‐Term Ecological Research Program PELD‐SELA funded by the Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico (CNPq 445301/2020‐1).

FundersFunder number
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
European Commission
101117423
FB210018
RYC2021‐034198‐I
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico445301/2020-1
Institut de recherche pour le développementAMX‐22‐CPJ‐05, 402299/00
National Geographic SocietyNGS‐101549R‐23
STP37
101117423

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
      SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
    2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
      SDG 13 Climate Action

    Keywords

    • Indigenous and local knowledge
    • reciprocal relations
    • reciprocity
    • social-ecological systems

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Human–nature relationships through the lens of reciprocity: Insights from Indigenous and local knowledge systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this