Comparative Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials

Jordan Llerena-Velastegui, Kristina Zumbana-Podaneva, Sebastian Velastegui-Zurita, Melany Mejia-Mora, Juan Perez-Tomassetti, Allison Cabrera-Cruz, Pablo Haro-Arteaga, Ana Clara Fonseca Souza de Jesus, Pedro Moraes Coelho, Cristian Sanahuja-Montiel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a major global health issue and a leading cause of death. This study compares the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the management of IHD, focusing on their impact on revascularization, myocardial infarction (MI), and post-procedural stroke. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of PCI and CABG in treating IHD based on an exhaustive literature review of the past 5 years, emphasizing recent advancements and outcomes in IHD management. Methods: A comprehensive literature review analyzed 32 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The study specifically assessed the incidences of revascularization, stroke, and MI in patients treated with either PCI or CABG. The comparison between CABG and PCI exclusively focused on lesions with a SYNTAX score exceeding 32. Results: Our findings highlight CABG’s significant efficacy over PCI in reducing revascularization and MI. The aggregated Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) value for revascularization was 1.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.65 - 2.07), signifying CABG’s advantage. Additionally, CABG demonstrated superior performance in diminishing MI occurrences (M-H = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.13 - 6.53). In contrast, PCI was more effective in reducing stroke (M-H = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.60 - 1.10). Conclusion: The study confirms CABG’s superiority in reducing revascularization and MI in IHD patients, highlighting PCI’s effectiveness in reducing stroke risk. These findings underscore the importance of personalized treatment strategies in IHD management and emphasize the need for ongoing research and evidence-based guidelines to aid in treatment selection for IHD patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-168
Number of pages16
JournalCardiology Research
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Journal compilation

Keywords

  • Coronary artery bypass graft surgery
  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Meta-analysis
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Revascularization

Cite this